A few weeks ago, out of curiosity I decided to look into the ownership of NewsBreak. I did not know about the Reuters investigation or the lawmakers warnings about its Chinese ties. The app bills itself as the go to source for local US news and seems harmless at first glance with 40 million monthly active users, but the Reuters investigation revealed serious national security and intelligence risks and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle have made comments on the record about its risks. After learning this, I immediately thought about my how I would disclose this situation on the same platform to my 4,000 followers. Writing this article became part of the solution.
In June 2024, a bombshell Reuters investigation exposed these issues. The report detailed how the app headquartered in Mountain View, California, but with active offices and engineering teams in Beijing and Shanghai has published fabricated or wildly inaccurate stories using AI tools that scrape the web, rewrite press releases, and hallucinate events that never happened. Reuters identified at least 40 such instances since 2021, backed by court documents, cease and desist letters from real news outlets, and an internal 2022 company memo flagging worries about AI generated content.
On Christmas Eve 2023, NewsBreak ran a viral headline screaming Christmas Day Tragedy Strikes Bridgeton, New Jersey Amid Rising Gun Violence in Small Towns. The story claimed a local resident was found dead from a shooting in the 100 block of West Broad Street. Bridgeton police immediately debunked it nothing even remotely similar had occurred. It seems this news outlets AI writes fiction they have no problem publishing to readers, the department stated publicly. NewsBreak quietly removed the article four days later, blaming a content source issue. Local authorities had to issue corrections, and the false report had already spread panic and eroded trust in real local journalism.
These problems triggered bipartisan alarm in Congress. Just days after the Reuters expose (June 7, 2024), three prominent lawmakers publicly demanded greater scrutiny: Senator Mark Warner (D VA), Chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, declared, "The only thing more terrifying than a company that deals in unchecked, artificially generated news is one with deep ties to an adversarial foreign government." He added that this represents yet another example of the serious threat posed by technologies from countries of concern. "We simply cannot win the game of whack a mole with individual companies."
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi (D IL), the top Democrat on the House Select Committee on China, stressed, "This report brings to light serious questions about NewsBreak, its historical relationship with an entity that assisted the CCP, and to Chinese state linked media, Americans deserve full transparency on any ties to the Chinese Communist Party especially on platforms wielding opaque algorithms and AI to shape news."
Representative Elise Stefanik (R NY) highlighted the role of IDG Capital, the Beijing based private equity firm that was a primary backer of NewsBreak and had just been added to the Pentagons list of companies allegedly linked to Chinas military (in February 2024). "We cannot allow our foreign adversaries access to American citizens data to weaponize them against Americas interests," calling for increased scrutiny to protect US data and information platforms.
The companys structure only deepens the red flags. NewsBreak launched in the US in 2015 as a direct subsidiary of Yidian, a Chinese news aggregation app. Both were founded by the same CEO, Jeff Zheng. The two entities even share a US patent (No. 11,113,347, filed in 2015) for an Interest Engine algorithm that personalizes news based on users locations and behaviors. NewsBreak remained a subsidiary until at least 2019, and Yidian openly referred to it as its US version as late as 2021. A 2022 internal roster showed 100 of its 137 engineers based in China. Former employees told Reuters that the bulk of algorithm development and core engineering still occurs in Beijing and Shanghai offices. Chinese job postings for NewsBreak roles have explicitly sought engineers and data analysts skilled in in depth mining of massive user behaviour data from the apps American users.
NewsBreak insists it is US based and US invested, stores data on American servers, and complies with US privacy laws. Yet lawmakers and critics argue that without full disclosure of foreign investment stakes, algorithmic decision making, and AI training processes, these assurances ring hollow especially when Chinese based teams control the systems that decide what millions of Americans see.
To monetize content as a contributor on NewsBreak, creators must apply through the Contributor Portal after hitting thresholds like publishing 10 approved articles and gaining 100 followers. The process involves detailed personal and professional disclosures including setting up accounts on third party payment platforms like Tipalti, which require tax identification, identity verification, and often extensive background details akin to a professional resume (work history, education, credentials, and references). Combined with the apps tracking of location data, reading habits, engagement metrics, and device information, this creates rich user profiles. In the hands of a foreign adversary, such data could enable sophisticated targeting: mapping influence networks, identifying key professionals, or even facilitating recruitment, social engineering, or disinformation operations. Monetized contributors unwittingly hand over sensitive career details that could be exploited against them or their contacts.
In my own experience, these issues hit home. I posted a legitimate video from the US Coast Guard that was inexplicably flagged for a community violation for violence 3 months after it failed to post. Multiple well researched articles hours of work each were rejected by opaque filters. Suddenly, my new pieces received only a fraction of the views my earlier content had drawn, suggesting algorithmic suppression or shadow banning. In addition to the large number of bots, fake profiles started copying my content to dilute it as is mentioned in the Newsbreak investigation. These frustrations, layered atop the foreign data risks and contributor privacy exposures, were the final straw. I walked away from the idea of monetization entirely and launched my own independent website and started posting on X and Facebook where you can follow me there. Thank you for reading.
Comments